Albert Einstein's speculation on general relativity states that time travel to the past can be seen through axial wormholes or possible dark holes. Let us not emphasize the actual existence of an experienced mind to make such exits, as this suggestion enters the circle of mental tests. Stephen Hawking now argues that time travel to the past is absurd, as he recommends a particularly astonishing miracle, such as the hitherto undetectable serial defense conjecture that confuses her and thus makes the world safe for historical connoisseurs. I thought of unprecedented conjectures as the present journey to the past, which is constructed by Einstein’s theory of general relativity. I think it secures the Hawking sequence, along with various formations like universes delivered by an open mix.


Time travel is a staple of science fiction stories, books, movies and television series. Time travel is also noticeable on a basic level. Usually we talk about anticipation, which we do with double digits, assuming it is necessary. However, in the absence of methodologies in conflict with the light velocities with the core region, they could travel to the distant future (compared to this region from the beginning) without developing an indistinguishable number of years (twin capture 22). It is also clear that a back trace is allowed by the hour, with the study of curious local material of possible wormholes and dark vents, presumably making Einstein's general theory of relativity the main factor. The problem is that the theory of relativity predicts wormholes that, if missing in any amplitude, will be available for a nanosecond and will be quite small, and in that sense they don’t really matter in a reasonable period for drivers. a journey. Since we don’t know exactly what’s inside a black hole and where it leads, and we predicted where, current thinking suggests that exploring through black holes is a more valuable approach to completing them all than turning back the clock, but the jury is out on the uncle.


Anyway the Catch 22 variety, whose most famous is Granddad Catch 22, can be an amazing piece no matter how long it’s like a current drive. Imagine a situation where you go back in time and kill your grandfather before having a baby. Your father (or your mother). Assuming that’s the case, that means the pregnancy can’t happen, but if the pregnancy doesn’t happen, you won’t have the option to go back to the show to kill your archetype. Such things love science fiction (and logical) creators just like physicists! The curious time travel is when you get something endless for the first time. Let’s say you have a copy of “Hamlet” and you need a Shakespearean sign. So I went back in time to Shakespeare’s time. He presses his entry, but the worker says he’s away for the day, but if he leaves the book, he’ll sign it and you can. When Shakespeare came home, he saw the book, he got it, and he was so overjoyed. that he missed nights making a copy. He will return the next morning, pick up his now-labeled "Hamlet," and revisit the gift with his most important book to date. Today the exam goes, where did the main “Hamlet” come from? You didn't write it. However, Shakespeare didn’t do that either, because he faked your copy, so it looked like his work at the time.


Or something like that, accepting that you can travel backwards, obviously others can. Usually there are a lot of people interested in some events, perhaps at the time, seemingly minor (but in the long run they ultimately have an effect). So you can have several groups of the explicit core problems, each with its own layout (most essentially unconnected), and ultimately cause annihilation. I mean, if one person doesn’t come back and influences an event that leads to another outcome, the two people can go back and practice that sequel and things will be reviewed, which will advise, at this point, the third person exclusively. Rather rewind and influence objects, so in general the story can never be fixed, but consistently.